What If We Set Aside Half the Planet for Wildlife?
What If We Set Aside Half the Planet for Wildlife?
About 65 million years ago, a mass extinction event occurred, wiping out more than 75% of all species on Earth. There have only been 5 mass extinctions in our planet’s 4.5 billion year history. But the next one has already started. By the end of this century, one in six species on Earth could be gone. Will humans go with them?
Transcript and sources: https://whatifshow.com/what-if-we-set-aside-half-the-planet-for-wildlife/
Join our Patreon community and help make What If better: http://bit.ly/whatif-patreon
Can you translate this episode into another language? Add subtitles and we will link your YouTube channel in the description: https://www.youtube.com/timedtext_video?v=ICyMaJKbujk
Watch more what-if scenarios:
Planet Earth: http://bit.ly/YT-what-if-Earth
The Cosmos: http://bit.ly/YT-what-if-Cosmos
Technology: http://bit.ly/YT-what-if-Technology
Your Body: http://bit.ly/YT-what-if-Body
Humanity: http://bit.ly/YT-what-if-Humanity
T-shirts and merch: http://bit.ly/whatifstore
Suggest an episode (detailed): http://bit.ly/suggest-whatif
Feedback and inquiries: https://underknown.com/contact/
What If elsewhere:
Instagram: http://bit.ly/whatif-instagram
Twitter: http://bit.ly/whatif-twitter
Facebook: http://bit.ly/facebook-whatif
What If in Spanish: http://bit.ly/YT-Spanish-what-if
What If in Mandarin: http://bit.ly/YT-Chinese-what-if
What If is a mini-documentary web series that takes you on an epic journey through hypothetical worlds and possibilities. Join us on an imaginary adventure through time, space and chance while we (hopefully) boil down complex subjects in a fun and entertaining way.
grow trees in every hours
We need to set aside 90% of the planet for nature. Considering that humans only occupy only 10% of the planets still habitable surface i think that nature should be given near total supremacy again.
Unfortunately, we humans always seem to need to loose it all first, before we learn to appreciate what we had… maybe we need a new mass extinction ๐๐คทโโ
Bad seeds?
I think this is a good idea even tho half of our buildings from all around wil be abandon
The 99%: we’re all in this together
Billionaires: yep we definitely built these rockets for everyone to survive
When he said bc every time a species goes extinct it brings humans closer to our own extinction
I got mad chillโs
Modern feminism and trans policies are what’s going to we d us into extinction
THIS IS DEFINITELY FEASIBLE AUSTRALIA SND THE WEST COAST OF AMERICA ARE EMPTY SO IS SIBERIA AND THE AMAZON RAIN FOREST
I DONT GET EHAT YOUR SAYING?
The no human side would eventually have humans due to the low cost of living from camping full time and the amount of natural resources that would be available to survive.
Everyday i grow respect for thanos more and more
"I mean yeah displacing literally billions of people and causing mass starvation and dehydration is bad but think of the animals ๐ฅบ๐ฅบ๐ฅบ๐ฅบ๐ฅบ"
Cool idea, except biomes and ecosystem are a thing
1:16 The only thing I want is to see the day when humanity go excint
How about we set aside the eastern hemisphere? The western hemisphere has all those rich countries, so we could help the people that live in developing countries. Although than again, if we set aside the western hemisphere, we could save the amazon rainforest…
Ha ha so long as most humans are addicted to eating what they call ‘meat’ this would just make poaching easier!
A nuclear war can be the next mass extinction. The radiation can kill billions of people
Mother Nature: Am i a joke to you?
Hmm, Guys i am the only one who wanna this happend and wanna live in the natural zone? Byee humans now i am freรฉ >:D
Who else read the mercy I heard what if merchandise
I have an amazing what if you could maybe do! What If Earth was the 1st planet to the sun?
The question is which half and for how long will we allow them this peace. Another question is are we prepared to deal with evolved animals.
25 Percent for Wildlife
50 Percent for Human Population
10 Percent for Companys and Factorys
10 Percent on Plant Crop growth
5 percent on Cattle
Let’s not bother, as 65 million years ago, planet was doomed, it wasn’t over population or any environmental problem. Fear Allah that’s it
We do One things So Every Country make their forest area in their center of the country it’s possible I think
I’m sorry but this is just fear mongering, misinformation and bad faith.
Half-Earth is an idea from Edward O Wilson who, while mentioned in this video, isn’t credited as it’s creator. I strongly recommend everybody to read his book if you do care for the environment and want the actual information on Half-Earth.
First of all, it wouldn’t involve displacing people or rampant famines and no farming due to water and land loss, where the hell did that come from? Again, this video fails to cite that. There’s no reason it should be the care – I’m assuming the video-makers think it’s about slicing the world in half and dedication that one half to the biosphere, and the other to human populations. However, it’s not that at all. It’s literally about protecting the bits of nature which we do have and restoring that which we’ve lost. Each country could do their part by dedicating half of their land to nature. This would mean, for example in the USA, each state could mark areas with no towns or cities as conservation zones. At WORST this would mean reclaiming land owned by some small handful of rich people who use it for no reason at all and dedicating it to conservationism. At WORSE it would mean that people cannot just so easily ‘buy’ land for factories.
It’s not as drastic as this video really makes it out to be, and it is achievable and logical. Edward O Wilson spent his entire life study Biology and wrote books from the 70s up to his dead in Late 2021/2022.. This does a disservice to Edward O Wilson and his entire lifetime of study and writing, and doesn’t even cite its arguments. To sensationalise it as some distant fantasy, is bad faith and doesn’t even consider the possibility of this, which we NEED as a means to save the planet.
PLEASE read Half-Earth by Edward O Wilson. It’s a relatively short book (260-300 pages or so) and his writing is captivating and written so that people who have never once studied Biology or Ecology could understand and learn a lot from it.
๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ๐ญ
Sir suggested what if you coated your body with shoe glue?
I’d leave the human side and go hide in the jungle alone with the animals
Population matters. I’m not having kids because the environment needs to thrive. Stop killing animals!!!! Stop hunting.
the whole world can live without money peacefully because there are no humans who want money for outerspace but we cant live without forests and wildlife
Wow my country trian
this is exactly what i think and believe but humans won’t change, the worse will have to happen first and then 3/4 of the planet and more will be free
Half the planet is not enough!
proud to be a indian
It will get rid of pollution
Rezourzez
Without wildlife, it would negatively affect our air quality
I donโt mean any offense but we take up 50-70 percent of the earth as it is. So really if we sanctioned off half the earth weโd most likely be okay
The question is what side of earth needs to be conserved for this concept ๐ค
that bad idea
We need wildlife
No bugs no US
Actually it was 66 billion years ago not 3.5 billion years ago mr.what if
Sigh not changed earth again
This would actually mean there won’t be much pollution than before.
๐๐๐ค๐ค๐๐ป๐๐ป
Earth hates us humans but likes animals.
More than 70% of land is unused by humans. So technically this would be a downgrade.
Everybody who has 3+ kids is contributing to the slow death of this world. The best thing that can happen to this planet is the human population quits expanding